<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Well, that&#8217;s some creative lawyering</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clareified.com/2012/10/09/well-thats-some-creative-lawyering/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clareified.com/2012/10/09/well-thats-some-creative-lawyering/</link>
	<description>I can&#039;t count the reasons I should stay; one by one they all just fade away</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:47:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gib</title>
		<link>http://www.clareified.com/2012/10/09/well-thats-some-creative-lawyering/comment-page-1/#comment-455762</link>
		<dc:creator>Gib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 23:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clareified.com/?p=13076#comment-455762</guid>
		<description>Plenty of times criminal cases have error, but don&#039;t get reversed because the evidence was so overwhelming that it didn&#039;t matter what the mistake was.  I see this being the case.  

&quot;This court finds that yeah, defense counsel could have done better, however, the evidence against defendant was so overwhelming that even if the defense team had all the time in the world to prepare, and were made up of all the lawyers ever dreamed up by David E. Kelley plus three Supreme Court Justices, and the prosecution team was Harvey Birdman, that guy who always got waxed by Perry Mason, and a hobo, the defendant still would have been convicted.  Affirmed.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plenty of times criminal cases have error, but don&#8217;t get reversed because the evidence was so overwhelming that it didn&#8217;t matter what the mistake was.  I see this being the case.  </p>
<p>&#8220;This court finds that yeah, defense counsel could have done better, however, the evidence against defendant was so overwhelming that even if the defense team had all the time in the world to prepare, and were made up of all the lawyers ever dreamed up by David E. Kelley plus three Supreme Court Justices, and the prosecution team was Harvey Birdman, that guy who always got waxed by Perry Mason, and a hobo, the defendant still would have been convicted.  Affirmed.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
