Monday Funday
Monday Funday
All weekend I’ve been watching the talking heads debate the merits and dangers of allowing gay marriage. Personally, I don’t see why the conservative right is so up at arms on this issue. From what I know about married couples, allowing gay marriage is probably the best bet for decreasing gay sex.
November 24th, 2003 at 4:10 pm
The conservative case for gay marriage:
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/22/opinion/22BROO.html
November 24th, 2003 at 4:10 pm
The conservative case for gay marriage:
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/22/opinion/22BROO.html
November 24th, 2003 at 4:10 pm
The conservative case for gay marriage:
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/22/opinion/22BROO.html
November 24th, 2003 at 4:19 pm
The conservative case for non-copulative marriage:
http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=www.nrc.nl/images/bush,7.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.nrc.nl/W2/Lab/Leestafel/inhoud.html&h=198&w=307&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dbush%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%26sa%3DN
November 24th, 2003 at 4:19 pm
The conservative case for non-copulative marriage:
http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=www.nrc.nl/images/bush,7.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.nrc.nl/W2/Lab/Leestafel/inhoud.html&h=198&w=307&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dbush%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%26sa%3DN
November 24th, 2003 at 4:19 pm
The conservative case for non-copulative marriage:
http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=www.nrc.nl/images/bush,7.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.nrc.nl/W2/Lab/Leestafel/inhoud.html&h=198&w=307&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dbush%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%26sa%3DN
November 24th, 2003 at 4:20 pm
Yeah, that doesn’t open but wow I’m sure it’s just hilarious.
November 24th, 2003 at 4:20 pm
Yeah, that doesn’t open but wow I’m sure it’s just hilarious.
November 24th, 2003 at 4:20 pm
Yeah, that doesn’t open but wow I’m sure it’s just hilarious.
November 24th, 2003 at 5:09 pm
http://www.nrc.nl/images/bush,7.jpg
November 24th, 2003 at 5:09 pm
http://www.nrc.nl/images/bush,7.jpg
November 24th, 2003 at 5:09 pm
http://www.nrc.nl/images/bush,7.jpg
November 24th, 2003 at 9:20 pm
This is totally ridiculous. It almost sounds like the old blue-collar adage that sex ends when you get married.
Reducing gay sex is not the issue here. The issue is rewarding certain paths through life.
And frankly, are you saying the contract of marriage will lead gays to meing monogamous? Are they not capable of that without marriage? Stupid.
And frankly again, I have gotten more sex in a relationship than I ever did being single.
November 24th, 2003 at 9:20 pm
This is totally ridiculous. It almost sounds like the old blue-collar adage that sex ends when you get married.
Reducing gay sex is not the issue here. The issue is rewarding certain paths through life.
And frankly, are you saying the contract of marriage will lead gays to meing monogamous? Are they not capable of that without marriage? Stupid.
And frankly again, I have gotten more sex in a relationship than I ever did being single.
November 24th, 2003 at 9:20 pm
This is totally ridiculous. It almost sounds like the old blue-collar adage that sex ends when you get married.
Reducing gay sex is not the issue here. The issue is rewarding certain paths through life.
And frankly, are you saying the contract of marriage will lead gays to meing monogamous? Are they not capable of that without marriage? Stupid.
And frankly again, I have gotten more sex in a relationship than I ever did being single.
November 24th, 2003 at 9:54 pm
Kashei, as you might have guessed, it is a picture of Dubya. cut-and-paste the link and it should work, but I have to admit it was mildly amusing at best, and not worth the multiple posts. The Brooks piece was a good one, by the way.
Scott, dude, lighten up. Congratulations on that “relationship”, by the way. Sounds like it’s about time for another one.
November 24th, 2003 at 9:54 pm
Kashei, as you might have guessed, it is a picture of Dubya. cut-and-paste the link and it should work, but I have to admit it was mildly amusing at best, and not worth the multiple posts. The Brooks piece was a good one, by the way.
Scott, dude, lighten up. Congratulations on that “relationship”, by the way. Sounds like it’s about time for another one.
November 24th, 2003 at 9:54 pm
Kashei, as you might have guessed, it is a picture of Dubya. cut-and-paste the link and it should work, but I have to admit it was mildly amusing at best, and not worth the multiple posts. The Brooks piece was a good one, by the way.
Scott, dude, lighten up. Congratulations on that “relationship”, by the way. Sounds like it’s about time for another one.
November 24th, 2003 at 10:43 pm
Very funny Dawn. You wacky Liberal. Next thing you’ll want is the right for Gay parents to adopt children….damn too late.
Are we still on for that walk into the sunset ?
November 24th, 2003 at 10:43 pm
Very funny Dawn. You wacky Liberal. Next thing you’ll want is the right for Gay parents to adopt children….damn too late.
Are we still on for that walk into the sunset ?
November 24th, 2003 at 10:43 pm
Very funny Dawn. You wacky Liberal. Next thing you’ll want is the right for Gay parents to adopt children….damn too late.
Are we still on for that walk into the sunset ?
November 25th, 2003 at 4:17 pm
Sure, DTDT, but you’ve got to e-mail me first.
November 25th, 2003 at 4:17 pm
Sure, DTDT, but you’ve got to e-mail me first.
November 25th, 2003 at 4:17 pm
Sure, DTDT, but you’ve got to e-mail me first.