http://cms.hhs.gov/schip/statepln.asp

http://cms.hhs.gov/schip/statepln.asp

http://cms.hhs.gov/schip/statepln.asp

Yes, more dead bodies lie ahead. They will mostly be killed by Baathists and Jihadis. Even if you blame Uncle Sam for every one of them, they are far fewer than those killed by Saddam.
What was your plan for getting rid of Saddam, who was killing and would have continued to kill on a scale that dwarfs what we have done?
Did you want to lift sanctions?
Would that have been cost free, or led to the dreaded WMD armed Saddam?
If you wanted to keep or tighten sanctions, would that have killed people?
I think those that Saddam would have starved under sanctions (to feed gullible public opinion) could just as easily be blamed on us as those killed when his supporters bombed the Red Cross. (again, for public opinion purposes, not because such targets are worthy by themselves)
Dennis McLain

Yes, more dead bodies lie ahead. They will mostly be killed by Baathists and Jihadis. Even if you blame Uncle Sam for every one of them, they are far fewer than those killed by Saddam.
What was your plan for getting rid of Saddam, who was killing and would have continued to kill on a scale that dwarfs what we have done?
Did you want to lift sanctions?
Would that have been cost free, or led to the dreaded WMD armed Saddam?
If you wanted to keep or tighten sanctions, would that have killed people?
I think those that Saddam would have starved under sanctions (to feed gullible public opinion) could just as easily be blamed on us as those killed when his supporters bombed the Red Cross. (again, for public opinion purposes, not because such targets are worthy by themselves)
Dennis McLain

Yes, more dead bodies lie ahead. They will mostly be killed by Baathists and Jihadis. Even if you blame Uncle Sam for every one of them, they are far fewer than those killed by Saddam.
What was your plan for getting rid of Saddam, who was killing and would have continued to kill on a scale that dwarfs what we have done?
Did you want to lift sanctions?
Would that have been cost free, or led to the dreaded WMD armed Saddam?
If you wanted to keep or tighten sanctions, would that have killed people?
I think those that Saddam would have starved under sanctions (to feed gullible public opinion) could just as easily be blamed on us as those killed when his supporters bombed the Red Cross. (again, for public opinion purposes, not because such targets are worthy by themselves)
Dennis McLain

Point is, it’s not a specific part of the political spectrum who are intent on abridging our rights to free speech. It’s people who can’t take the time to teach their children that not everything they see is going to be good, or true. Take care of your kids–but don’t expect me to change my listening habits/television habits/video game habits for them.

Point is, it’s not a specific part of the political spectrum who are intent on abridging our rights to free speech. It’s people who can’t take the time to teach their children that not everything they see is going to be good, or true. Take care of your kids–but don’t expect me to change my listening habits/television habits/video game habits for them.

Point is, it’s not a specific part of the political spectrum who are intent on abridging our rights to free speech. It’s people who can’t take the time to teach their children that not everything they see is going to be good, or true. Take care of your kids–but don’t expect me to change my listening habits/television habits/video game habits for them.

But allowing children to be bombarded with so-called “music” with lyrics like “fuckin’ bitch, ‘ho, suck my dick”, etc., is child abuse and a condemnation of what we have become as a society. Parents accepting the marketing of thong underwear to pre-teen girls with “Sexy” written on them in sequins by Abercrombie & Fitch is the equivalent of acting as their pimps. If only we were as concerned with the affects upon children of second-hand filth, as we were second-hand smoke! We are eating our young.

I could go on and on with examples of how our gutter culture is ruining children and our entire nation. It is destroying our souls. It makes us ugly and shallow. Among the very reasons there IS so much child abuse, poverty, street crime, family abuse, struggling schools, child drug abuse, child depression and suicide, sexual abuse amongst minors, children having children, etc., is the fact that we have thrown our children to the corporate wolves who force the most lurid, shocking, tittilating, “edgy” crap down their throats and we don’t do a damn thing about it.

And why do parents do this? Because they don’t want to be “uptight”, or “nerdy” or “overbearing”. They don’t want to be called Puritanical. At some point we relaxed and decided to be our childrens’ “friends” rather than protectors and moral instructors.

And who made this abdication of parental responsibility chic? The cultural Left. It is the Left which has the utterly materialistic worldview, who thinks that as long as we tinker with the social, political and economic machine just right, we will provide the real, profound spiritual needs of humans. It is the most shallow of all possible worldviews and is anything but “humanistic”.

But allowing children to be bombarded with so-called “music” with lyrics like “fuckin’ bitch, ‘ho, suck my dick”, etc., is child abuse and a condemnation of what we have become as a society. Parents accepting the marketing of thong underwear to pre-teen girls with “Sexy” written on them in sequins by Abercrombie & Fitch is the equivalent of acting as their pimps. If only we were as concerned with the affects upon children of second-hand filth, as we were second-hand smoke! We are eating our young.

I could go on and on with examples of how our gutter culture is ruining children and our entire nation. It is destroying our souls. It makes us ugly and shallow. Among the very reasons there IS so much child abuse, poverty, street crime, family abuse, struggling schools, child drug abuse, child depression and suicide, sexual abuse amongst minors, children having children, etc., is the fact that we have thrown our children to the corporate wolves who force the most lurid, shocking, tittilating, “edgy” crap down their throats and we don’t do a damn thing about it.

And why do parents do this? Because they don’t want to be “uptight”, or “nerdy” or “overbearing”. They don’t want to be called Puritanical. At some point we relaxed and decided to be our childrens’ “friends” rather than protectors and moral instructors.

And who made this abdication of parental responsibility chic? The cultural Left. It is the Left which has the utterly materialistic worldview, who thinks that as long as we tinker with the social, political and economic machine just right, we will provide the real, profound spiritual needs of humans. It is the most shallow of all possible worldviews and is anything but “humanistic”.

But allowing children to be bombarded with so-called “music” with lyrics like “fuckin’ bitch, ‘ho, suck my dick”, etc., is child abuse and a condemnation of what we have become as a society. Parents accepting the marketing of thong underwear to pre-teen girls with “Sexy” written on them in sequins by Abercrombie & Fitch is the equivalent of acting as their pimps. If only we were as concerned with the affects upon children of second-hand filth, as we were second-hand smoke! We are eating our young.

I could go on and on with examples of how our gutter culture is ruining children and our entire nation. It is destroying our souls. It makes us ugly and shallow. Among the very reasons there IS so much child abuse, poverty, street crime, family abuse, struggling schools, child drug abuse, child depression and suicide, sexual abuse amongst minors, children having children, etc., is the fact that we have thrown our children to the corporate wolves who force the most lurid, shocking, tittilating, “edgy” crap down their throats and we don’t do a damn thing about it.

And why do parents do this? Because they don’t want to be “uptight”, or “nerdy” or “overbearing”. They don’t want to be called Puritanical. At some point we relaxed and decided to be our childrens’ “friends” rather than protectors and moral instructors.

And who made this abdication of parental responsibility chic? The cultural Left. It is the Left which has the utterly materialistic worldview, who thinks that as long as we tinker with the social, political and economic machine just right, we will provide the real, profound spiritual needs of humans. It is the most shallow of all possible worldviews and is anything but “humanistic”.